#BOOK OF JAMES STUDY OUTLINE TRIAL#

However, in the modern period a leader such as Erasmus questioned the book. 382) and Carthage (397) appeared to secure a place for James. The acceptance of the book as canonical by the synods of Rome (A.D. He suggested that someone had published it in the name of James, the LordвЂ™s brother. Jerome accepted it m the Vulgate, but he indicated some uncertainty about it. In the West the Epistle of James did not achieve wide acceptance until such leaders as Jerome and Augustine gave it their support. Origen, as previously mentioned, is from this period of time and represents an exception to this trend. There are few witnesses to the existence and usage of James for much of the second and third centuries after Christ. It is omitted from the Muratorian Canon which is believed to represent the views concerning the canon in the church at Rome around A.D. No quotations from James appear in the known writings of Tertullian, Irenaeus, Cyprian, or Hippolytus. Although some regarded the book as a false writing, he acknowledged that many sections of the church used James publicly. He conceded that many approved the writing and referred to the belief by some that James, the brother of Jesus, had written it.

He listed the book among what he called the antilegomena, books which were not universally received by the church. The church historian Eusebius related that James was a disputed book in some sections of the church. He admitted that some sections of the church had not received the book, but he expressed no doubts about its canonicity. The earliest known writer to quote the Epistle of James by name is Origen. Edmond Hiebert, The Epistle of James: Tests of a Living Faith (Chicago: Moody Press 1979) pp 115. Internal evidence is the information which the Bible itself makes available.Д®xternal Evidence An excellent discussion of external evidence concerning the authorship of James appears in D. Their evidence is external because it is not based on Scripture. External evidence concerns what Christian leaders have said about the book. We will examine some of these problems and the solutions which are proposed.Д®vidence concerning the authorship of James is both external and internal. The lack of a specific addressee and uncertainty about which James wrote the book also contributed to a lack of widespread enthusiasm for the book. The brevity and content of James made it easy for some Christians to ignore the book. James will call us back to the searching scrutiny of the gospel message and urge us to live as doers of the law rather than as mere hearers. In a world which seems to take delight in continuing to find new ways of sinning, the firm commands of James have a necessary relevance. Tusker, The General Epistle of James in Tyndale New Testament Commentaries (London: Tyndale Press, 1957), p. After he has been led to respond to the gospel of grace, and come to have the joyful assurance that he is a redeemed child of God, if he is to advance along the way of holiness, and if the ethical implications of his new faith are to be translated into practical realities, then he needs the stimulus and the challenge of the Epistle of James. This Epistle would seem to be of especial value to the individual Christian during what we might describe as the second stage in his pilgrimвЂ™s progress. Typical among the positive evaluations is that of R. 35: Word and Sacrament (Philadelphia: Muhlenberg Press, 1960), 362.ДЇew other Christians have followed LutherвЂ™s excessively negative emphasis. James epistle is really an epistle of straw, compared to these others, for it has nothing of the nature of the gospel about it.вЂќ Martin Luther, LutherвЂ™s Works, ed. After commending the books of John, 1 John, Romans, Galatians, Ephesians, and 1 Peter which showed Christ, Luther said, вЂњTherefore St. Not many will remember LutherвЂ™s negative opinion about the book of James. Most Christians remember Martin Luther as the man whose courage and conviction brought the Reformation into existence. The Reclamation of Straying Christians (5:19-20) The Demonstration of Economic Justice (5:1-6) The display of the correct attitude (4:15)

The Defeat of Godless Self-confidence (4:13-17)Дў. The Practice of Personal Discipline (3:1-18) The demonstration of saving faith (2:21-26)Д. The emptiness of an unproductive faith (2:14-20)Дў. The Production of Works of Mercy (2:14-26)ДЎ. An appeal to avoid partiality (2:12-13)Д¬. The specific evidences of response (1:26-27)Дў.

A Correct Response to GodвЂ™s Word (1:19-27)ДЈ. The Words of a Prophet-The Evidence of Genuine Faith (1:19-5:20)ДЄ. Explanation of divine involvement (1:17-18) Identification of the human source (1:14-15)Д¤. Repudiation of the divine source (1:13)Дў. The Source of Human Temptation (1:13-18)ДЎ.

#BOOK OF JAMES STUDY OUTLINE TRIAL#

The Correct Attitude in Trial and Temptation (1:2-4)Д¬. The Words of a Pastor-How to Face Trial (1:2-18)ДЄ.

Book of james study outline